For the long-time readers of my blog, I warn you, I may have posted this before. It's probable. However, this sort of thing bears repeating. So enjoy.
Epistolary as well as personal discourse is, according to the
mode in which it is carried on, one of the pleasantest or most irksome things
in the world. It is delightful to drop in on a friend without the solemn
prelude of invitation and acceptance – to join a social circle, where we may
suffer our minds and hearts to relax and expand in the happy consciousness of
perfect security from invidious remark and carping criticism. We may give the
reins to the sportiveness of innocent fancy, or the enthusiasm of warmhearted
feeling. We may talk sense or nonsense, (I pity people who cannot talk
nonsense), without fear of being looked into icicles by the coldness of
unimaginative people, living pieces of clockwork, who dare not themselves utter
a word, or lift up a little finger, without first weighing the important point
in the hair balance of propriety and good breeding.
It is
equally delightful to let the pen talk freely, and unpremeditatedly, and
to one by whom we are sure of being understood, but a formal letter, like a
ceremonious morning visit, is tedious alike to the writer and receiver – for
the most part spun out with unmeaning phrases, trite observations,
complimentary flourishes, and protestations of respect and attachment, so far
not deceitful, as they never deceive anybody. Oh the misery of having to
compose a set, proper, well worded, correctly pointed, polite, elegant epistle!
– One that must have a beginning, a middle, and an end, as methodically
arranged and portioned out as the several parts of a sermon under three heads,
or the three gradations of shade in a schoolgirl’s first landscape!
For my
part, I would rather be set to beat hemp, or weed in a turnip field, than to
write a letter exactly every month, or every fortnight, at the precise point of
time from the date of our correspondent’s last letter, that he or she wrote
after the reception of ours – as if one’s thoughts bubbled up to a wellhead, at
regular periods, a pint at a time, to be bottled off for immediate use.
Thought! What has thought to do in such a correspondence? It murders thought,
quenches fancy, wastes time, spoils paper, wears out innocent goose-quills –
“I’d rather be a kitten, and cry mew, than one of those same” prosing
lettermongers.
Surely in
this age of invention something may be struck out to obviate the necessity (if
such necessity exists) of so tasking – degrading the human intellect. Why
should not a sort of mute barrel organ be constructed on the plan of those that
play sets of tunes and country dances, to indite a catalogue of polite epistles
calculated for all the ceremonious observances of good breeding? Oh the
unspeakable relief (could such a machine be invented) of having only to grind an answer to one of one’s “dear
five hundred friends!”
Or, suppose
there were to be an epistolary steamengine – ay, that’s the thing – steam does
everything nowadays. Dear Mr. Brunel, set about it, I beseech you, and achieve
the most glorious of your undertakings. The block-machine at Portsmouth would
be nothing to it – that spares manual labour – this would relieve mental
drudgery, and thousands yet unborn - - - But hold! I am not so sure the female
sex in general may quite enter into my views of the subject. Those who
pique themselves on the elegant style of their billets, or those fair
scribblerinas just emancipated from boarding school restraints, or the
dragonism of their governess, just beginning to taste the refined enjoyments of
sentimental, confidential, soul-breathing correspondence with some Angelina,
Seraphina, or Laura Matilda; to indite beautiful little notes, with long-tailed
letters, upon vellum paper, with pink margins sealed with sweet mottoes, and
dainty devices, the whole deliciously perfumed with musk and attar of roses –
young ladies who collect “copies of verses,” and charades – keep albums – copy
patterns – make bread seals – work little dogs upon footstools, and paint
flowers without shadow. Oh, no, the epistolary steam engine will never come
into vogue with those dear creatures. They
must enjoy the “feast of reason, and flow of soul,” and they must write. Yes,
and how they do write!
But for
another genus of female scribes – unhappy innocents! Who groan in spirit at the
dire necessity of having to hammer out one of those aforesaid terrible
epistles. They, in due form, date the gilt-edged sheet that lies outspread before
them in appalling whiteness, having also felicitously achieved the graceful
exordium, “My dear Mrs. P.” or “My dear Lady V.” or “My dear – anything else,”
feel that they are in for it, and must say something. Oh, that something
that must come of nothing! those bricks that must be made without straw! those
pages that must be filled with words! Yea, with words that must be sewed into
sentences! Yea, with sentences that must seem to mean something, the
whole to be tacked together, all neatly fitted and dovetailed so as to form one
smooth, polished surface!
What were
the labours of Hercules to such a task! The very thought of it puts me into a
mental perspiration, and, from my inmost soul, I compassionate the unfortunates
now (at this very moment, perhaps), sitting perpendicular in the seat of
torture, having in the right hand a fresh-nibbed patent pen, dipped ever and
anon into the ink bottle, as if to hook up ideas, and under the outspread palm
of the left hand a fair sheet of best Bath post, (ready to receive thoughts yet
unhatched), on which their eyes are riveted with a stare of disconsolate
perplexity infinitely touching to a feeling mind.
To such
unhappy persons, in whose miseries I deeply sympathize - - - have not I groaned
under similar horrors, from the hour when I was first shut up (under lock and
key, I believe), to indite a dutiful epistle to an honoured aunt? I remember,
as if it were yesterday, the moment when she who had enjoined the task entered
to inspect the performance, which, by her calculation, should have been fully
completed. I remember how sheepishly I hung down my head when she snatched from
before me the paper, (on which I had made no further progress than “My dear
ant,”) angrily exclaiming, “What, child! have you been shut up here three hours
to call your aunt a pismire?” From that hour of humiliation I have too often
groaned under the endurance of similar penance, and I have learned from my own
sufferings to compassionate those of my dear sisters in affliction. To such
unhappy persons, then, I would fain offer a few hints, (the fruit of long
experience), which, if they have not already been suggested by their own
observation, may prove serviceable in the hour of emergency.
Let them
--- or suppose I address myself to one particular sufferer – there is
something more confidential in that manner of communicating one’s ideas. As
Moore says, “Heart speaks to heart” – I say, then, take always special care to
write by candlelight, for not only is the apparently unimportant operation of snuffing
the candle in itself a momentary relief to depressing consciousness of mental
vacuum, but not unfrequently that trifling act, or the brightening flame of the
taper, elicits, as it were, from the dull embers of fancy, a sympathetic spark
of fortunate conception. When such a one occurs, seize it quickly and
dexterously, but, at the same time, with such cautious prudence, as not to
huddle up and contract in one short, paltry sentence, that which, if
ingeniously handled, may be wire-drawn, so as to undulate gracefully and
smoothly over a whole page.
For the
more ready practice of this invaluable art of dilating, it will be expedient to
stock your memory with a large assortment of those precious words of many
syllables that fill whole lines at once, “incomprehensibly, amazingly,
decidedly, solicitously, inconceivably, incontrovertibly.” An opportunity of
using these is, to a distressed spinner as delightful as a copy all m’s and n’s
to a child. “Command you may, your mind from play.” They run on with such delicious
smoothness!
That hurt my brain.
ReplyDelete