Thursday, 22 September 2011

I cannot say I am a fan of "life verses". This general un-fan-ness can also be applied to life chapters. That is, chapters or passages of the Bible that people take and apply as the be-all and end-all of what one ought to do in order to be a good Christian, whether as a pastor, husband, wife, child, or anything else. People label themselves according to a particular chapter or passage.

Now, I do not intend for my dislike to mean I believe the practice is utterly wrong. I would not condemn anyone who has a life verse, nor would I tell people to give up on being a "Proverbs 31 woman", for instance. In fact, I like Proverbs 31.

But I hope my life will be ordered by the whole of Scripture, not one passage. God's Word in its entirety is meant for our instruction, that we may be competent, thoroughly equipped for every good work. If I structure the whole of my life around just one passage, I wonder, what will I miss?

Considering Proverbs 31, I have a lot of different questions concerning what is written there. Here are a few: Why does she work hard for her family? Why does she give to the needy? What is wisdom? Why does she teach with kindness? What does she teach? What does it mean to fear the Lord?

To find the answers to these things, I would have to search the rest of Scripture. Scripture answers itself. Progressive revelation shows more and more of what God has spoken to us. We can look ahead, look back, look around and through and upside down to find the answers to our questions. The whole of Scripture is meant to give us competence, not one chapter or passage. We ought to read and study and apply the whole thing, not split it up into fractured lists of what applies to one, and what to another.

Consider also Titus 2, which is an excellent instruction:

Older women likewise are to be reverent in behavior, not slanderers or slaves to much wine. They are to teach what is good, and so train the young women to love their husbands and children, to be self-controlled, pure, working at home, kind, and submissive to their own husbands, that the word of God may not be reviled.
(Titus 2:3-5 ESV)

However, my questions spring up again: how can an older woman teach a younger woman about these things without going into the theological reasons behind them? How can they go into the theological reasons without knowing the Bible through-and-through? Why ought a woman to be reverent in behaviour? What is "good"? Why ought a young woman to love her husband and children? Why ought she to be self-controlled, pure, working at home, kind, and submissive to her own husband? What does it mean to revile the Word of God?


I am not advocating the idea that all believers ought to be certified theologians before talking about the Bible. If I were, I would have to close this blog down right now. However, I do believe that we ought all to search the Scriptures daily, to be familiar with the whole counsel of God. We shouldn't settle on a single verse or passage, even though every single verse is the soul's thirst-quenching need. Look at the whole of God's Word. Look at the entirety of what God has spoken to us. It is a blessing. It is life.


Give me understanding, that I may keep your law
and observe it with my whole heart.
Lead me in the path of your commandments,
for I delight in it.
Incline my heart to your testimonies,
and not to selfish gain!
Turn my eyes from looking at worthless things;
and give me life in your ways.
Confirm to your servant your promise,
that you may be feared.
Turn away the reproach that I dread,
for your rules are good.
Behold, I long for your precepts;
in your righteousness give me life!
(Psalm 119:34-40 ESV)



Photobucket

7 comments:

  1. I agree. The Bible is complete and perfect, ONE BOOK. All of it. And all parts speak of the Gospel, all parts point to Christ.

    That Bible reading plan that Mom got me on to, the ten chapters a day? It's awesome for showing this fact.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The problem with any reading plan is that, the idea is 'good', but it can open the habit of a works-based faith. What God has designed is that we receive the Word from the pulpit, we study and apply it to our life through the week, and by the time we've exhausted all the info we can gather on the subject it's time for Church again. We need not follow any guide, any plan, except for Gods. Anytime I think, "oh I missed my devotion's this morning..." that was ordained by God, and when I do have a chance to meditate and read His word and learn more on what was taught to me, God gets the glory, not me. It is Him doing the work, growing the fruit, blessing me with the time to commune with Him.

    As for following a particular passage instead of drinking in all of scripture, I agree, the whole Bible supports itself and the deeper we delve the more evident Christ is.

    It's fantastic.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good thoughts, Linda. This is why I firmly believe that women shouldn't limit their mentoring and teaching to issues of home, family, how to love husbands and children, etc. I want to know the WHOLE of God's Word, for it points to Christ, who is my all in all.

    @Rachel - I wonder if you have ever thought about the priesthood of the believer? I also wonder if you understand that God puts a new heart within - one that has a deeply personal relationship with the God who dwells within.

    It is not always works-based to strive to daily meditate on the Word of God. It is a delight and a joy, it is true food, it is light on the path. Without God's word in your heart, you easily stray into sin. "I will hide God's Word in my heart, that I might not sin against Thee."

    Sticking to only what we have learned on Sunday seems to me to be limiting the feast that is mine as I sit at the feet of my Saviour.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I like that ten-chapter reading plan. It does show the way the Bible ties into itself. I was doing it, and then I got my new Bible. I don't know why but that threw everything off. I want to keep reading the ten chapters in my study Bible. In my now-most-used Bible, I just read whole books, in one sitting if I can.

    ~

    A pastor can preach a works-based faith, too. ;) I think we ought to receive the preaching with eagerness, and then search the Scriptures daily to find out whether these things are so. (Acts 17). God calls such a thing "noble" (verse 11).

    I agree with what you said about devotions, too. I used to really beat myself up about that. I still do, sometimes. I'm learning to rest in the grace that God has given. Slow road. :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. From the perspective of the Bible as "literature" I have never been a fan of "reading plans". Just as it would make no sense (to me) to take a book - say Lord of the Rings - and read a page or so here, jump several chapters and read a page or so there, in my opinion the Bible should be read in a continuous motion, from Genesis to Revelation AT FIRST READING (at a minimum.) Only a chapter by chapter, verse by verse study reveals the magnificence of HIS story through history. Once that (sequential reading) has been done it is appropriate to further study particular "themes" that have personal life applications.

    As far as dwelling on what is preached from the pulpit, that is okay, but does not take the place of our own responsibility - as individual "priests" to conduct individual studies. The danger of "pulpit only" study is the quenching of the Spirit, and I believe any pulpit who preaches "pulpit only" study is encroaching on the rights - and responsibilities - of individual believers. God has designed His Word to be sufficient for individual study. It is the Holy Spirit who guides us into truth, (John 16:13) not the pulpit, which is one of many tools the Spirit uses, not the sole or exclusive or even primary one.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Since the original blog post was not about reading the Bible, but about using it as a "whole", I can assume that @Rachel's comment was in response to mine.

    Let me clarify.

    I never meant to imply, nor do I believe, that reading the Bible everyday makes you a "good" Christian. I was simply stating WHY I agreed with the blog.

    Next.

    @Rachel said: "We need not follow any guide, any plan, except for Gods."

    Exactly. And when I sit down to read my Bible, and pray with fervent heart that He will teach me and show me His will, are you saying that He is unable? I think you're limiting the size of God's pants.


    @Rachel: "What God has designed is that we receive the Word from the pulpit, we study and apply it to our life through the week, and by the time we've exhausted all the info we can gather on the subject it's time for Church again."

    The gist of what I understand from your comment is that we should not be doing independent study of God's Word to us, His People, but should only rely on our Pastor to teach us. First of all, I think that's again underestimating God, saying that He isn't able to teach His people. And secondly, sounds a LOT like Catholicism to me. Wasn't it the Catholic Church that stated that the people were not able to study the Bible, but only able to learn from the ordained priests?

    I thought we had a Reformation?

    ReplyDelete
  7. I did not say to limit the study of Gods word only to what a fallible man teaches, but to ensure that what God has set up be the first priority.

    Sorry for changing the subject Linda, that wasn't my motive.

    ReplyDelete

By swallowing evil words unsaid, no one has ever harmed his stomach. ~Winston Churchill

Smart guy.